Making It (Even) Harder: On the Difficulty of Phishing Attacks in View of Security Indicators

Metadane

• Autorzy: Melanie Volkamer, Verena Zimmermann, Benjamin Fabian, Nina Gerber, Sebastian Feld
• Rok: 2020
• Źródło: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pages 319–338, Springer
• DOI/Link: HCII 2020, Springer
• Status: to-read
• Pochodzenie: Wyekstrahowane z anti-phishing-training-2025 (theoretical limitations of training)
• Tagi: to-read reference security-indicators human-processing fundamental-limitations hci

Notatki

Publikacja dodana automatycznie z bibliografii.

Kontekst cytowania w Anti-Phishing Training 2025:

• Referenced jako [89] w paper
• Theoretical work on fundamental limitations
• Shows limitations in human processing of security indicators
• Aligns with empirical findings on training ineffectiveness

Key Theoretical Contribution:

• Even with training, humans have fundamental cognitive limitations
• Processing security indicators is inherently difficult
• Theoretical grounding for why training may be ineffective

Quote from Anti-Phishing Training 2025:

“These findings align with theoretical work by Volkamer et al., who show fundamental limitations in human processing of security indicators [89].”

Significance:

• Provides theoretical explanation for empirical findings
• Suggests training limitations are not just methodological but fundamental
• Important for understanding WHY training doesn’t work (not just THAT it doesn’t)

Dodaj PDF aby wygenerować pełne podsumowanie używając /summarize-paper volkamer-phishing-difficulty-indicators-2020